# Abhinay Jain describes a police-verification and subscription refund dispute
[View the HTML page](https://broomeesreviews.com/reviews/abhinay-jain-verification-refund-dispute/)
1. [Home](/index.md)
2. [Reviews](/reviews/index.md)
3. Abhinay Jain describes a police-verification and subscription refund dispute
The case file · CASE-056
Jain says local police verification was unavailable in Uttar Pradesh, his ₹8,000 refund was refused, a chargeback was contested, and he later received a ₹14,000 renewal invoice.
Babysitter service · Abhinay Jain · Date: 11mo when collected
## The experience
Abhinay Jain’s LinkedIn post and comments describe a six-month babysitter plan and an ₹8,000 advance. Jain says sales staff represented that domestic workers were police-verified and that he could receive a full refund if he did not find a suitable provider. He says he requested local police verification in Noida and was told Broomees could not provide it in Uttar Pradesh, so he would need to arrange and pay for it himself.
Jain says the company refused his refund request, contested his credit-card chargeback on the basis that service had been provided, and that he ultimately stopped pursuing the ₹8,000. He also says he later received a ₹14,000 renewal invoice despite believing he had not used the service. The post was displayed as “11mo” when collected. His statements about verification and refund promises remain Jain’s account.
## Separate customer-call account: Kunal Anand
The additional case notes describe Kunal Anand’s temporary nanny booking in Bengaluru, with an experience date of 9 May 2025. Anand says they expected a punctual start, the listed skills and timely coordinator follow-up. Anand reports that the assigned worker changed at short notice and that the replacement had not received the same instructions.
The chronology begins with a requirements discussion and booking request on 7 May 2025. The assignment and service window were confirmed on 8 May. The first scheduled service took place on 9 May, and Anand recorded the concern. On 10 May, Anand contacted support and requested a remedy. The notes list the profile shared before booking, a support-ticket transcript and a bank-transfer reference as supporting material. The response proposed a service credit while the coordinator checked the attendance record.
Anand reports receiving a partial refund after several support contacts. The outcome was last checked on 28 June 2025. The account was posted on 22 July and updated on 29 July 2025, adding the company response while leaving the earlier service description unchanged. The notes relate it to another account about replacement timing and a separate note on billing explanations.
Sequence
## Timeline
1. 11mo when collected
### Post published
Jain described his verification and refund concerns in the LinkedIn post and comments.
## Source
[LinkedIn public post and comments](https://www.linkedin.com/posts/abhinay-jain_will-you-earn-8000-forcefully-to-lose-50000-activity-7376104507816124416-RGmy)
More in the file
## Related case files
[Browse all cases](/reviews/index.md)
Case file CASE-036
Domestic help
### [Akshay Taneja describes a refund refusal and hard-to-find policy](/reviews/akshay-taneja-refund-policy/index.md)
Taneja says Broomees refused his refund under a policy statement he says was more than 20 clicks into the website and absent from his signed documents.
[Read this case](/reviews/akshay-taneja-refund-policy/index.md)
Case file CASE-028
Domestic help
### [Anurav Chopra describes a delayed worker search and pending refund](/reviews/anurav-chopra-refund-wait/index.md)
Chopra says Broomees had searched for a worker for over a month and that they had waited 15–20 days for a refund after receiving a standard escalation response.
[Read this case](/reviews/anurav-chopra-refund-wait/index.md)
Case file CASE-016
Domestic help
### [Smitarekha Rai recounts an advance payment without a service start](/reviews/billing-clarity/index.md)
In a complaint-site listing, Rai says she paid an advance for domestic help, had no worker start by day 12, and was denied a refund.
[Read this case](/reviews/billing-clarity/index.md)
## Site information
[Broomees Reviews](/index.md)
Independent stories, with context.
## Explore
- [All reviews](/reviews/index.md)
- [Topics](/topics/index.md)
- [Search](/search/index.md)
## About
- [Company](/company/index.md)
- [About Broomees Reviews](/about/index.md)
- [Founders](/company/founders/index.md)
## Information
- [Privacy](/privacy/index.md)
- [Terms](/terms/index.md)
- [Sitemap](/sitemap/index.md)
## Recent case files
[Browse all cases](/reviews/index.md)
- [abhimarx describes repeated cook and cleaner performance concerns](/reviews/abhimarx-worker-experience/index.md)
- [Akshay Taneja describes a refund refusal and hard-to-find policy](/reviews/akshay-taneja-refund-policy/index.md)
- [Anurav Chopra describes a delayed worker search and pending refund](/reviews/anurav-chopra-refund-wait/index.md)
- [Smitarekha Rai recounts an advance payment without a service start](/reviews/billing-clarity/index.md)
- [Chirag describes worker-skill concerns and an unfulfilled relocation request](/reviews/chirag-worker-skills-relocation/index.md)
[Read this page as Markdown](/reviews/abhinay-jain-verification-refund-dispute/index.md)
© 2026 Broomees Reviews
---
[Browse all pages](/index.md)