The case file · CASE-021

Pratikshya Pattnaik raises a worker identity concern

A complaint-site listing says Pattnaik was told a worker was named Pooja, then received a call from someone claiming to be the actual Pooja.

What the source says

The listing says a worker introduced as “Pooja,” whose profile was shared by Broomees, worked for five days. On the fifth day, Pattnaik says an unknown caller claimed to be the actual Pooja. The listing frames this as a breach of trust; the remainder is truncated on the tag page.

Source and limitations

This case file summarizes a Consumer Complaints Court tag listing collected on 13 October 2026. This is a user-submitted complaint, not a court finding. The identity allegation is serious and unverified in the accessible excerpt, which is truncated. No independent evidence or later outcome is established here.

Sequence

Timeline

  1. Complaint listed

    The complaint-site listing is dated 13 December 2023.

Source limits

Evidence and context

The source is a user-submitted complaint, not a court finding. The identity allegation is serious and unverified in the public excerpt, which is truncated.

Source: Consumer Complaints Court tag listing. Collected October 13, 2026.

Another perspective

Company statement

This case file does not include a company statement.

Published