Public accounts · Sources linked
Case files summarize public posts and complaint listings about Broomees services. Each report links to its source and explains what the available material does and does not establish.
These pages summarize public-source accounts. They are not court findings, and the reported claims have not been independently established here.
CASE-016 · Smitarekha Rai
A complaint-site listing says Rai paid an advance for domestic help, had no worker start by day 12, and says a refund was denied.
Source date: Complaint listed 11 October 2023
The listing describes the account as posted on 11 October 2023.
Public-source reports
The wording distinguishes what a source reports from what the source excerpt does not verify.
Case file CASE-005
A LinkedIn post says Barve paid ₹9,000 on 31 March and had not received a maid by 22 April; the post says follow-ups were delayed or ignored.
Read this caseCase file CASE-021
A complaint-site listing says Pattnaik was told a worker was named Pooja, then received a call from someone claiming to be the actual Pooja.
Read this caseCase file CASE-015
A consumer complaint listing says Maurya bought a six-month cook subscription and needed repeated follow-ups about the agreed start date and time.
Read this caseCase file CASE-007
A Trustpilot review says Gupta paid ₹36,000 for a full-time nanny, found the assigned nanny unsuitable for infant care, and waited 45 days for a promised replacement.
Read this caseRead with context
Check the linked source, its date, and the evidence limitations on each case page. A complaint listing is not an adjudicated finding.
Each report explains what was not available or independently checked.
Editorial approachSubmission information explains the current route and publication approach.
How to submitMore to explore
Review sourced details about the business, services, and founders.