The case file · CASE-109

Anukriti Goel describes a subscription scope mismatch and refund delay

Anukriti Goel says workers assigned under a ₹5,700 subscription either failed to match the requested work and dates or failed to arrive. She says refund timelines shifted and no helper had been supplied since November 9.

The public account

Anukriti Goel says workers did not match the requested work or dates, or failed to arrive. She says refund timelines shifted and that no helper had been supplied since November 9. The complaint identifies a ₹5,700 subscription.

Separate appended account: Arjun Bedi

Arjun Bedi’s appended account concerns a pet-care visit booking in Indore on 20 June 2024. Bedi expected a pre-service briefing, written pricing and continuity across shifts. The service began as booked, but Bedi says the scheduled follow-up visit was missed without advance notice.

The requirement discussion and booking request were on 18 June; the assignment and start window were confirmed on 19 June. Bedi contacted support on 21 June for a remedy.

The notes list a work schedule, payment confirmation and a copy of the escalation email. A coordinator offered to rearrange the next visit but did not address every point in Bedi’s message. A credit was discussed, but Bedi says the original payment question remained open.

The last check recorded for Arjun Bedi’s account is 2024-08-19. The account was posted on 24 August 2024 and updated on 30 August; the update added the replacement offer and retained the first-visit account. The notes cite a nearby-area report about a missed follow-up visit and disputed cancellation charge.

Sequence

Timeline

  1. Complaint listed 2023-12-01

    Complaint listed

    The account appeared on 2023-12-01 on Consumer Complaints Court complaint.

Source

Consumer Complaints Court complaint

More in the file

Browse all cases