The case file · CASE-073

Fit_Measurement3709 reports short placements and disputed billing

Fit_Measurement3709 says three assigned workers each stayed about two hours and left after purchase of a ₹9,000 six-month plan, and alleges being billed for a 12-month plan they did not choose.

The public account

Fit_Measurement3709 says they paid ₹9,000 for a six-month plan. Three people each stayed for about two hours and then left, and the author says Broomees counted those placements as three replacements. The post also alleges a bill for a 12-month plan that the author says they did not choose.

Separate appended account: Rhea Anand

Rhea Anand’s appended account concerns a temporary nanny booking in Kolkata on 8 June 2024. Anand expected a punctual start, the listed skills and timely coordinator follow-up. Anand says the first visit began later than the confirmed window and that duties discussed during booking were treated as optional.

The requirement discussion and booking request were on 6 June; the assignment and start window were confirmed on 7 June. Anand contacted support on 9 June for a remedy.

The notes list an invoice, appointment messages and a note of calls to the help desk. The company offered a replacement window and asked for more time to review the charge. Anand reports receiving a partial refund after several contacts with support.

The last check recorded for Rhea Anand’s account is 2024-08-14. The account was posted on 7 August 2024 and updated on 13 August; the later update added the company response and left the earlier service description unchanged. The notes cross-reference two entries about delayed arrival notices in the same city.

Sequence

Timeline

  1. Review posted 2y ago on the source page

    Review posted

    The account appeared on 2y ago on the source page on Reddit post.

Source

Reddit post

More in the file

Browse all cases