The case file · CASE-213

Pulkit Narayan: nanny payment not returned

Pulkit Narayan says that after the first nanny was sent, they stopped using the service and had still not received their money back.

Pulkit Narayan’s account

Pulkit Narayan said he had a similar experience and that after the first nanny was sent, they did not use the service further but still had not received their money back.

Review posted: 1y (relative display at capture). The public account is attributed to Pulkit Narayan.

Separate account: Harini Bedi

Harini Bedi describes a weekday home cook booking in Mumbai on 2023-10-04. Harini says they expected the agreed duty list, transparent charges and a backup arrangement. They say service began as booked but a scheduled follow-up visit was missed without advance notice.

Their timeline records the booking request on October 2, assignment and start-window confirmation on October 3, the first service and concern on October 4, and support contact and remedy request on October 5.

The source lists a work schedule, payment confirmation and escalation email.

The company offered a replacement window and more time to review the charge. A substitute was offered after escalation; Harini says they ended the booking before the next scheduled visit.

Harini Bedi’s account was last checked on 2023-12-21. The account was posted on December 19, 2023; updated December 30, 2023. The account updated the entry after receiving a support reply. The supplied notes cite a nearby-area report about a missed follow-up visit and disputed cancellation charge.

Sequence

Timeline

  1. Review posted: 1y (relative display at capture)

    Source-post date

    Pulkit Narayan says that after the first nanny was sent, they stopped using the service and had still not received their money back.

Source

LinkedIn comment on Ayush Aggarwal post

More in the file

Browse all cases